By Abigail Eagye
In the summer of 2002, the Hayman Fire burned across nearly 140,000 acres, securing legendary status as the largest fire in Colorado’s history. It took nearly a month to control the fire, and 132 homes were lost in the blaze.
Hayman’s indirect effects are still being measured, as government agencies, public utilities, nonprofits and private landowners continue efforts to repair the landscape. Denuded hillsides require extensive replanting to combat ongoing erosion into critical watersheds. And while the forest slowly regenerates, massive amounts of sediment continue sliding into waterways, upsetting the balance of river-dependent ecosystems and choking some of the state’s major water supply reservoirs.
State and federal agencies, naturally, have a hand in the cleanup, but they are limited by geographical and topical jurisdictions. Hayman burned across four counties, three U.S. Forest Service ranger districts, three Colorado State Forest Service ranger districts and three different conservation districts, making the coordination of restoration efforts a veritable nightmare.
Watershed groups however, have stepped up to organize across such geopolitical boundaries. Unrestrained by ecologically arbitrary delineations, they work throughout entire watersheds and have played pivotal leadership roles in the rehabilitation that follows devastating fires like Hayman—and in efforts to prevent future catastrophic fires—for the sake of their watersheds.Read more: Fire Away: Why watershed groups are focusing on forest recovery and fire risk-reduction
By Jayla Poppleton
It’s not everyday that the government starts a watershed group. Watershed groups tend to be the non-profit, citizen-led counterparts to government agencies. But last year, through an act of the Colorado Legislature, the Fountain Creek Watershed, Flood Control and Greenway District arrived on the scene of a watershed plagued by flooding and other urban drainage-related problems. The district, though officially a government entity, will function like many watershed groups that serve to coordinate a multitude of players working to improve their shared watershed.
Gary Barber, who was hired as the district’s executive director in February, thinks the district is “a bit of a public policy experiment.”“Hopefully, we bring the best qualities of a watershed group, an advocacy group, to the front, and we also bring forth the best aspects of a regional flood control, erosion control and storm control entity,” he says.
In the Summer 2010 issue of Headwaters, CFWE explores the world of volunteerism and grassroots river protection. There are over 80 community watershed groups in Colorado. Their purposes are as varied as the environments they are working to study, restore and protect. Watershed groups provide so many services: they bring our communities together through promoting volunteerism; they provide data on water quality, habitat integrity and recreational use that is needed by state and federal agencies to make informed decisions; and they work collaboratively to achieve land and water protections that can be embranced by stakeholders of many different viewpoints. Read on to learn more about the work of these committed individuals... Read featured articles below, or
By George Sibley
By Cally Carswell 